Negotiation Styles
If you are on this page, you likely completed our self-assessment test on Negotiation Styles. If not, we encourage you to do it. You can download it here.

Assertive
-
Assertiveness can backfire if it crosses into aggressive territory, potentially leading to lesser gains in negotiations.
-
It’s crucial to balance pursuing one’s own objectives while also valuing and addressing the needs of the other party.
-
Demonstrating understanding and recognition towards them can be beneficial.

Collaborative
-
Individuals with a collaborative approach tend to harness creativity to seek shared benefits, aiming to enhance the overall value for all involved.
-
They often engage in trading items with unequal value to address problems, viewing each issue as a chance for mutual advancement.
-
However, a cautious, step-by-step approach is advisable when dealing with parties of uncertain trustworthiness.

Compromising
-
Those who are quick to compromise may end up with less satisfying outcomes, often choosing expedience over thoroughness.
-
The act of compromising should ideally come into play only after all other negotiation strategies have been explored and a minor discrepancy remains.

Avoiding
-
Avoidance usually leads to unmet objectives as it entails disengagement from conflicts.
-
While certain extreme situations necessitate avoidance (yes, you should avoid the man with the gun), in normal circumstances, it's more fruitful to engage with others.
-
Beginning with less ambitious requests can be a gentle step towards more active engagement.

Accommodating
-
Being accommodating often reflects good listening skills, yet overdoing it might jeopardize one’s own objectives.
-
It's vital to aim for fairness, secure clear commitments, and consider the involvement of neutral third parties when needed.
-
Those who struggle with accommodating others might find it helpful to gather more information, ask pertinent questions, and practice active listening to better navigate negotiations.
